• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

legal Domain names without SPF = Email Spoofers playground!

Status
Not open for further replies.

skylark

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2002
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Example: (For domain names not using email)
In DNS -
myvaluabledomain.com IN TXT "v=spf1 -all"
 
skylark -

Good advice, although it is also good practice to implement SPF for all of your domains. Pretty straight forward thing to do.

The validator you mentioned (http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html) is indeed an excellent one - Scott has been involved with the SPF standards track since pretty close to the very beginning and is the draft author / editor for the SPFbis (kind of a cleaned up final polished version of the experimental SPF standard document so many have already implemented), so he certainly knows his stuff where it comes to SPF.

For most folks, using the -all parameter should work, however, you might want to be aware that some folks (enom and the associated registries powered by enom come to mind) will tend to send renewal messages using your email address with them as the MAIL FROM address in the message envelope. Doing that is a rather poor idea, because it causes any SPF aware email server to reject mail addressed that way (after all, that is the very behavior SPF was invented to combat) unless (perhaps) you include the enom mail servers as having the right to send email from the domain(s) you use for email. Not exactly a best practice for a variety of reasons. Cannot entirely figure why they elected to send out messages this way. SPF has been around since the mid 2000s, so you would think they might want to address that issue by sending from some address like domainrenewals at the enom.com domain or one of their associated registry domain names in the MAIL FROM envelope header, if they have not done so already. I lost a name in the last year which I was fortunately able to pick back up after it was finally released because of this.

Finally, if you like SPF, you might also want to look into DMARC - http://www.dmarc.org/

Best,

Commerce
 
Interesting to know this was not around until the mid 2000. Good to know about the Enom emails although I ALWAYS renew my domains based on my own spreadsheet timeline - the enom email problem is just another reason not to depend on email for anything truly vital.



skylark -

Good advice, although it is also good practice to implement SPF for all of your domains. Pretty straight forward thing to do.

The validator you mentioned (http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html) is indeed an excellent one - Scott has been involved with the SPF standards track since pretty close to the very beginning and is the draft author / editor for the SPFbis (kind of a cleaned up final polished version of the experimental SPF standard document so many have already implemented), so he certainly knows his stuff where it comes to SPF.

For most folks, using the -all parameter should work, however, you might want to be aware that some folks (enom and the associated registries powered by enom come to mind) will tend to send renewal messages using your email address with them as the MAIL FROM address in the message envelope. Doing that is a rather poor idea, because it causes any SPF aware email server to reject mail addressed that way (after all, that is the very behavior SPF was invented to combat) unless (perhaps) you include the enom mail servers as having the right to send email from the domain(s) you use for email. Not exactly a best practice for a variety of reasons. Cannot entirely figure why they elected to send out messages this way. SPF has been around since the mid 2000s, so you would think they might want to address that issue by sending from some address like domainrenewals at the enom.com domain or one of their associated registry domain names in the MAIL FROM envelope header, if they have not done so already. I lost a name in the last year which I was fortunately able to pick back up after it was finally released because of this.

Finally, if you like SPF, you might also want to look into DMARC - http://www.dmarc.org/

Best,

Commerce
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom