Domain sale page content and it's legal implication.

[Ari GoldbergerAri Goldberger is verified member.]

Good news. Yes I remember taking care of that "Mickey Mouse" c&d.

 

[Drewbert]

> Then again, when the ICANN UDRP Review
>Task Force published a questionnaire seeking
>input on areas for reforming the UDRP and
>the UDRP rules, and when I looked at the
>survey responses, I had to scratch my head
>and wonder where all of those "someone"s
>manage to run off and hide when presented
>with a free opportunity to provide some
>input.

I don't, when you look at ICANN's track record for ignoring input from nobody's like me.

I can't see anything being changed at ICANN fighting from the inside.

 

[jberryhilljberryhill is verified member.]

I know what you mean. Sooner or later, everyone who approaches ICANN politics seriously and in good faith has what I call their "ICANN Moment", where they realize what a traveling circus it is.

That said, there were several people who were instrumental in ensuring that the UDRP was not rendered unwinnable. Without the dogged persistence of Michael Froomkin, Milton Mueller, Mikki Barry, and others who I only fail to mention due to a lapse of memory, the UDRP would have been a substantially different, and much more draconian, thing.

I do realize that one definition of insanity is to persist in doing something that has repeatedly failed to work...

 

[Success]

I just realized that this thread I started has become the highest viewed thread in Legal Issues forums with a view count of 878 at my time of writing.

I want to thank everybody for sharing their experience and expertise.

cheers to dnforum.