Time frame :
1. you questioned the ending date : 08-18-2005, 11:09 AM
2. i responded to your question and set the ending time : 08-18-2005, 11:24 AM
3. public announcement that you won : 08-19-2005 at 09:17 AM
4. 1st pm notice to you and ask for payment within 48 hrs : 08-19-2005, 09:19 AM
5. 2nd pm sent to remind your $5 payment : 08-20-2005, 11:41 AM
6. 2nd public announcement of your winning : 08-20-2005, 07:37 PM
7. 3rd public announcement of your winning and warning of negative feedback : 08-22-2005, 09:44 AM
8. 3 pm sent to remind for payment and payment time further extended 24 hrs : 08-22-2005, 09:56 AM
9. YOUR FIRST RESPONSE (pm) that you're no longer interested and won't honour the bidding: 08-22-2005, 10:22 AM
10. YOUR FIRST PUBLIC RESPONSE excusing that you've already responded to my various pms (not true as it just happened after my 3 pms and various public announcements) : 08-22-2005, 11:01 AM
This is the true time stamp and tells that your allegation that i contacted you 2 days after your winning is incorrect (you winning time is 08-19-2005, and pm was sent to you just 2 mins after public announcement).
I admitted the rule wasn't followed 100% but i did rectify it immediately after you voiced out and there was no moderator closing the thread nor you have officially withdrawal your bid. Your failure to respond also indicated that you just wish to avoid as you suddendly noticed that the name is soon expiring. But as i said, the bidder should have built in the expiry factor in placing bid.
THIS IS NOT FOR THE $5, this is to tell the truth!! Again, your trader rating tells everything.