closed eBroadband.info

[Tee]

Is the e and broadband repetitive?

 

[Duke]

I thought e prefixes went out of style with leisure suits.

 

[Tee]

Dang. So I guess presenting this name for sale whilst wearing a leisure suit must really make me appear out of style.

oy

 

[Ed30]

The Duke is right, but the e works with a name like this (although, of course, it's better not to have it). The info part lets it down. Developing is the only way.

 

[Tee]

Alright then, I'll develop it tomorrow or wed.

 

[Tee]

Hey wait - info is a good extension. Its the best extension besides .com. What else do you have? .Net?

.Net sucks!

.us is ok.

Even .orgs (the same name) sell for more than .nets!

 

[DryHeat]

i.e. broadband, .net would probably be way better than .org.

So, what do folks think the name is worth with various extensions; the asking price for the .com version is $975,000.00.

 

[Ed30]

If you think .info is better than .net then you're in the wrong business.

 

[Tee]

Absolutely, context is important. .Net is great for isps, hosts and such.

However, imo, broadband.info kicks broadband.net's ass.us

 

[Tee]

Generally, .Net is junk. Face it.

We all know that!

.org is better!

 

[Ed30]

What planet are you living on? Stop kidding yourself.

 

[Tee]

Who's kidding who?

.Orgs sell more than .nets!

.Net has never been a contender.

Yes, its second in the list in terms of

.com
.net
.org


But we all know its at the very bottom in terms of perceived worth.

 

[Duke]

Originally posted by Tee
Alright then, I'll develop it tomorrow or wed.

Why do you keep procrastinating Tee!

 

[Tee]

LOL!

I don't know. I guess its just all so easy that I just take a nap and the time goes by.

 

[Ed30]

I quote "we all know" - who is the "we"?

 

[Duke]

Originally posted by Tee
.Orgs sell more than .nets!

I'd like to see the data that supports that - especially since people have regged 2 1/2 times more .nets than .orgs.

I'm not against .orgs either (I like good names in all of the original 3 TLD's). I think people consider the name in its entirety (root and extension) when deciding what to pay and will do that even more so in the future.

That's why I think .info and .us have a chance too.

 

[Tee]

I should say resell for more.

Remember poker.org/.net?

Remember other big sales?

.Net just seems like a big second ran. And it cant shake the second ran, geeky soundingness it has.

I know many are giving up on getting .coms, but .nets?

Junk.

 

[Tee]

But, I should add, good luck in getting them and I could be wrong!

The order:

.Com
.Info
.Us
.Org
.Net/.biz/.WS/.CC

 

[cxz]

Info is generic and unrestricted. Also it is new and not overshadowed with com for years.
Many net's org's will be dropped in one year. Maybe half of them will be dropped. Same for com.
Info has a good chance. I don't trust resale values of either extensions. Things can change fast.

 

[options]

Yeah, .info in this case is a minus.

This remindes on one of my "on hold" names:

bbaccess.com

bbccss could be maybe interesting though.
Worth registering?