• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Favor Re: Validity Of C&D Via Email

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dave Zan

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,698
Reaction score
10
Hi guys,

I somewhat recall reading somewhere (either here or another forum) where a
Court found "valid" a C&D sent via email. I knew I should've bookmarked it on
the spot when I saw it, don't know why I didn't.

Highly appreciate it to anyone who recalls such and posts a link to it. Or even
if just a name so I can narrow down my search.

Thanks.
 
Dave you're confused again.

There is nothing "valid" or "invalid" about any way that I choose to communicate with you.

You are probably thinking not of a c&d letter, which I can send by pony express, smoke signals, carrier pigeon, or any other means, with service of process in a lawsuit. A court doesn't give a hoot whether or how someone sends you a letter. A court does care whether a lawsuit is properly served on a defendant.

There have been quite a few cases where service by email was deemed effective. How to effect service is up to the individual state or court involved. In service by email situations, typically the plaintiff will make a showing that other methods of service are impractical. On motion by the plaintiff, it is within the discretion of the court to deem any method of service to be proper, and email is a fairly common method.

http://www.internetcases.com/archives/service_of_process/index.html
 
That's why I put "valid" in quotation marks, for lack of a better term. I guess I
should've used "sufficient". :-D

And don't fret, I understand they're treated case to case. Most legal disputes
are, anyway, if not all of them.

Thanks for the link, John. Take care there.
 
I guess I
should've used "sufficient".

Well that's my question... "sufficient" for what?

A court doesn't give a hoot whether anyone sent a c&d letter to anyone else, much less how it was sent.

You might as well ask whether a court would consider an electronic birthday card to be "valid" relative to a paper birthday card. It's just a piece of mail with no substantial legal significance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom