Hi
these comments are definitely worth thinking about, but haven't changed my opinion.
Maybe its a different way of expressing what makes a domain inherently valuable?
For example, what would you say the inherent value of a domain like yahoo.com is? I'd say close to nothing.
The domain is now valuable because of the brand and web site associated with it. This brand, web site and business would have been just as powerful if they had originally chosen another domain, say yipee.com
So now of course the market value of the yahoo.com domain is millions of times greater than that of yipee.com, but only because of the domain's association with a brand and business, not because of any inherent value to do with the domain itself.
I never typed in yipee.com in to a web browser until just now, and wouldn't have ever typed in yahoo.com if Jerry Yang had not happen to choose this domain for his business.
Google/Overture numbers: The translation to a domain is not that straightforward
I'd guess the google numbers on skate vs skating would be inversely proportional to the number of people who will type in skate.com or skates.com vs skating.com, just to see what is there, just as millions more people will type in buy.com vs buying.com
I'm sure you've typed in thousands of names like the above to check out the site. how many times do you try the ing version, just to see what's there? Hardly ever, I'll bet. when dealing with new extensions like .us, hardly ever reduces to 0.
In my opinion, 'a deal with a supplier' isn't going to be any easier to get because of this particular domain. The supplier would want to know about site content, your experience of skates etc. Having A domain is good, but you could of chosen from hundreds of other possible variations, which, in a crux, is why the domain is only worth the reg fee.