S
Silverwire
Guest
This is not exactly a domain name question, but one that I'm sure may be of interest to any members who develop.
With regards to linking to any outside site, I understand that the safest way to do it legally is to link to the home page and avoid "deep linking".
However, whether I link to a home page or any other page, does it make any difference from a legal perspective whether I use an actual link (that may become eventually stale) or if I copy/archive the page to my own server to make sure the link/content is preserved?
On one hand, I do expect the legal treatment to be different. On the other, it doesn't seem like it should really make a difference whose server it is on.
I suppose someone will tell me that without permission it is all wrong, but in the practical world of liberal linking, is one in reality more risky than the other?
With regards to linking to any outside site, I understand that the safest way to do it legally is to link to the home page and avoid "deep linking".
However, whether I link to a home page or any other page, does it make any difference from a legal perspective whether I use an actual link (that may become eventually stale) or if I copy/archive the page to my own server to make sure the link/content is preserved?
On one hand, I do expect the legal treatment to be different. On the other, it doesn't seem like it should really make a difference whose server it is on.
I suppose someone will tell me that without permission it is all wrong, but in the practical world of liberal linking, is one in reality more risky than the other?