Darren06 said:Gariben are you sure? I heard they are legal because most of the videos are not hosted on their server.
byalik said:So in English that means its illegal?
I think John outlined it, and now you need to get more specific with your question byalik. When you say "these sites" you're asking a pretty broad question. Which sites? What action? etc. etc.
So in English that means its illegal?
I am with you aZooZa...;-)aZooZa said:I think I must have this wrong also. I thought that these streamed .asf files which use .asx files as their descriptors were no problem to host, together with some html that people can copy and paste on their own site (the sum being the "code"). These videos are put out as promos by the record companies to further record sales? Why would a reference to the streaming source (NOT physical hosting) be a problem?
I see videocodezone.com is carrying high-end ads -- surely the likes of Casale and Fastclick have vetted their content? This is also the site I saw somewhere that was sold for $200,000, four months from inception. That buyer must have done some due dilly on the deal? And it made $1700 on the last day before sale from ad revenue?
I'd love to know more...
Need a partner?aZooZa said:Oh - you can be sure I started one too12,000 codes and counting.
Darren06 said:I got one too.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators