For Sale New SnapNames design

[darrenl]

What do you guys think?

 

[diederik]

Argh
Ugly as hell

 

[Luc]

no offense to snapnames, but looks like they just pulled a $30 template off templatemonster.com.

i must have seen that girl (bottom picture) on a million sites by now.

solid company like snapnames shouldn't resort to cheap templates (if that's
what it is).

other than that, it's ok. liked the old one more, but i guess it was time for
a change...

 

[darrenl]

ok guys I like the old one too,, what I was just hoping for is along with their template they make their domain snapping software better.

 

[Cash Is King]

It is simpler to use. That is an advantage.

 

[WebCat]

I've been having trouble getting the search script to work, and they are over the top with disguising the "key code".

All in all, so far NOT an improvement. :-(

WebCat

 

[domainer111]

A good design with the emphasis on simplicity a real plus, imho.

Great to have the facility to search for 100 names back!

 

[HeavyLifting]

no offense to snapnames, but looks like they just pulled a $30 template off templatemonster.com.

my thoughts exactly. if i stumbled upon this site, i would assume it might be run by a 14 kid.

i love simple sites - i think it's the most admirable quality in web design. but something about their design just feels really cheap.

 

[.com.net.org]

old one better.

 

[stuff]

I really like this new one, Its simple and its fast, better then the old one

 

[Mr Webname]

As someone else said somewhere - without any prior announcement isn't the change surprising?
If it was another "secure site" like Paypal, what would you think on arriving there without having had any member warning?

 

[URLtrader]

old is (was) gold.

 

[skylight]

::have a hosting company feeling:: seems like a typical normal template...

 

[cyphix]

yep... when I first saw it my first thoughst were "are they serious?"... where di they pull this template from? The $5 shop?