Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🤖 Connect your own LLMs and agents through DNF AI Hub, similar to tagging @grok on X - Ask questions, research domains, and get AI help directly inside DNForum.
  • Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

RDNH wakefit.com case

Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
159
Reaction score
74
Apparently, this company is setup near my home...,

1736174564281.png


Indian mattress seller Wakefit Innovations tried to reverse hijack the domains wakefit.com and wake.fit, a World Intellectual Property Organization panelist has ruled. Wakefit Innovations, was incorporated in 2016. Wakefit.com was registered in 2009 and put to use for a business selling an exercise device.

Wakefit Innovations operates on wakefit.co
Wakefit Innovations had sales of $120 million in 2023-2024.


Domain was registered prior to the Complainant’s existence. Wakefit Innovations made other mistakes that led to the reverse domain name hijacking decision. Wadhwa Law Chambers represented Wakefit Innovations, and the Respondent was self-represented.

Complainant first broached subject, writing to the domain owner:


Hi Wakefit team. High-five on the awesome name both of us chose for our businesses! We are a memory-foam product-based company operating out of Bangalore, India specializing in mattresses and pillows looking to expand globally. To achieve that we believe a wakefit.com domain is essential and thus we wanted to have a conversation round it. Please let us know if you’d be interested and would be available to talk sometime next week. Thanks Wakefit Team

As quoted on DNW: Panelist Nick Gardner was further peeved that Wakefit Innovations presented the Respondent’s business and its website as being pretextual when it was clearly an operating business. He also noted that there is no evidence at all to support the allegation that the Respondent was engaged in a “pattern of cybersquatting activities.”

The highest offer for the domain was $3,000, while the Respondent apparently asked for $150,000.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom