• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Retribution Feedback

Status
Not open for further replies.

Duckinla

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
1,911
Reaction score
0
I've heard of several instances where a buyer or seller backed out of the deal. The other party is hesitant to leave negative feedback because the non-performing party will leave negative feedback as retribution.

My opinion is that if someone commits the double sin of Not performing on a transaction, and then leaving negative feedback purely as retribution, they should be banned for that. It's really important that a seller/buyer be able to leave honest feedback without fear of retribution. Otherwise the trader rating system loses its integrity and usefulness.
 
Upvote 0
I agree. This has happened to me several times, though I have always had the matter resolved by the mods.
 
I've heard of several instances where a buyer or seller backed out of the deal. The other party is hesitant to leave negative feedback because the non-performing party will leave negative feedback as retribution.

My opinion is that if someone commits the double sin of Not performing on a transaction, and then leaving negative feedback purely as retribution, they should be banned for that. It's really important that a seller/buyer be able to leave honest feedback without fear of retribution. Otherwise the trader rating system loses its integrity and usefulness.

I agree 100% :yes:
Pred :)
 
I've heard of several instances where a buyer or seller backed out of the deal. The other party is hesitant to leave negative feedback because the non-performing party will leave negative feedback as retribution. My opinion is that if someone commits the double sin of Not performing on a transaction, and then leaving negative feedback purely as retribution, they should be banned for that.

I wish eBay would learn that. The only negative I ever received was because I gave a non-paying, non-communicating bidder negative feedback. Then she went and gave me negative feedback for being an as..er, um,...not a nice person. Screwed either way.
 
You mean retaliation?

You are correct. Upon looking up the definition I see that retribution is the wrong word as retribution is "deserved". You learn something new every day.
 
And I "deserved" it because I was foolish enough to believe a Feedback system was a proper response.
 
I understand that but is there any penalty for leaving retaliation feedback? I was suggesting maybe a temporary ban as penalty. Without penalty, it will keep happening and th innocent party will have to go through the process to get it removed.
 
"if it keeps happening" but i had someone buy something- and not pay, and read, but not answer any pm's- he placed the highest offer by the end of the time listed- then ignored me- if i give him a bad rating for doing that- and he gives me one- do you remove the one on my account from him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom