• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

"Scam" Domains

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hyphen

New Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Assume that I have paid for one or two years of web hosting in advance to a company. After a week, my hosting goes down and completely disappears with no word from the company. The company continues to operate and ignores my emails for weeks.

I am aware of the cases where [company]sucks.com has been successful. Would I be more likely to face legal problems with [company]scam.com? If the material on a domain like that very exclusively expressed opinions and personal experiences, would legal issues be less likely?
 
First, hosting outfits come and go, and alot of them go when the propreitor tires of running a reseller hosting account.
Second, I wonder, is it really worth it to pursue besmirching a defunct or poorly-run outfit that probable didnt even own their own servers? Really? To what benefit?


Lastly, stick with the big outfits that have a long track record. You wont be disappointed.
 
Report it to your credit card company for a refund. They issue refunds on scams.
 
First, hosting outfits come and go, and alot of them go when the propreitor tires of running a reseller hosting account.
Second, I wonder, is it really worth it to pursue besmirching a defunct or poorly-run outfit that probable didnt even own their own servers? Really? To what benefit?


Lastly, stick with the big outfits that have a long track record. You wont be disappointed.
It was really only an example. I completely fabricated that scenario, but it was the first one that managed to come to mind.
 
I'd stick with sucks unless you have very clear and strong proof that they are scammers and even then, I'd personally still stick with 'sucks'.
 
It was really only an example. I completely fabricated that scenario, but it was the first one that managed to come to mind.

Salright.

On that note, it's a fine line to the path of liable.
If it isnt court-worthy, it isnt worth the risk.

I agree, stay with sucks, and make it an anti-fan site.
 
liable and libel are two different things...
...but this scenario could get a taste of both ;)
 
I own Cash Advance Scams [dot] com. I personally think it is better if you picked a generic term rather than go after an actual business or company. From my years of experience in business with my web design & hosting business, less friction is better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom