• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Wi-Fi TM

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trademarks require diligence. The owners have to protect them to maintain their rights.

It is possible that WI-FI has been loosely enforced as a certification mark and become so identified with the technology/ industry that it has lost its distinctiveness.

It may be an unenforceable mark.

This is not legal advice and I am not an attorney.
 
Originally posted by jberryhill
" The owner retains full enforcement rights as if it were the user of the mark.

Good, a comment from a lawyer finally:).

Are you saying then that the Wi-Fi alliance has the right to say which websites/domains can or cannot use the term "Wi-Fi" or even the term "WiFi" like wifigear.com?

If so, I find that a little wierd since wifi 411, wifi hotzone, wifi unlimited (trade mark), wifi-Texas, wi-fi spots, the wi-fi shop, and wifi networked are either registered service or trade marks for other companies.

Does any company besides Microsoft own a trademark or service mark with Microsoft in it? I don't think so:).
 
"Are you saying then that the Wi-Fi alliance has the right to say which websites/domains can or cannot use the term "Wi-Fi" or even the term "WiFi" like wifigear.com?"

No. I am studiously avoiding answering that question.

One might consider, as pointed out by the Cowboy, whether the term has passed into the vocabulary, such as indicated by the entry at webopedia.com.

But the way one obtains legal advice is by consulting an attorney under conditions of privilege and confidentiality.
 
Originally posted by jberryhill
"Are you saying then that the Wi-Fi alliance has the right to say which websites/domains can or cannot use the term "Wi-Fi" or even the term "WiFi" like wifigear.com?"

No. I am studiously avoiding answering that question.

Yea, I noticed that :). Thanks for your input on this one though.
 
Originally posted by jberryhill

But the way one obtains legal advice is by consulting an attorney under conditions of privilege and confidentiality.

As always, very sound advice. Thank you!
 
Elequa, Great name - wifi.net
 
Originally posted by elequa
you can not trademark "wifi"
www.wifi.net

Yea, I pretty much came to that same conclusion after researching the matter further to make sure. If they do fight me on it, which I doubt they will, I have a lot to fight with given the certification mark, the fact that my domain does not use a -, and the generic use of the name.

Thus, WiFiGear.com coming soon too :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom