Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🤖 Connect your own LLMs and agents through DNF AI Hub, similar to tagging @grok on X - Ask questions, research domains, and get AI help directly inside DNForum.
  • Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

closed 1011000.com - 1011000 = 88 in Binary Code

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.

chandldj

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Looking for help on valuation of 1011000.com

1011000 = 88 in Binary Code

Does anyone with experience in the China market think that this would be of value to a Chinese tech co?

What would you price this at?

Thank you in advance for your help!
 

ImageAuthors

New Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
1,257
Reaction score
147
That's clever. I'll give you that much. The electrical engineer in me gives you a high five. But will Chinese buyers want binary versions of lucky numerals? I haven't the faintest idea.

Even unlucky numbers can be made "lucky" if you choose to regard them in some base other than base 10 -- say base 11 or base 9 or 17.
 

Varlin

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
28
Ugly as hell.

Although I apologize if this is fine wine being offered to the uneducated taste

Nah. Just plain ugly. REG!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom