• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

closed A few .com/.us

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Many of these domains look more worthy after development. Especially those linux ones. Good luck! :)
 
MissFlora said:
Many of these domains look more worthy after development. Especially those linux ones. Good luck! :)
Maybe "Linux" has TM problem (owned by Linus T.) ...?
 
I don't think I will have any TM problems, thanks for the replies any money value to these?
 
P10n33R said:
I don't think I will have any TM problems, thanks for the replies any money value to these?
I am new to domain names, but after reading and watching for some time, I would say: develop, develop, develop.

1 hour development in average gives me in my projects 1 USD regular monthly income. To have a domain and wait if some "dumbja" types by mistake yourdomain.com into the bar to get 0.00x USD...? Thats a waste of potentials...
 
Thanks for your input. Any one else have any input?
 
mabster.com is nice and brandable. Could bring good enduser money if you give it some time.

Good luck
 
JEsports said:
mabster.com is nice and brandable. Could bring good enduser money if you give it some time.

Good luck

I agree! I guess mapster might get some typo type-in for napster?
 
I agree! I guess mapster might get some typo type-in for napster?

It is mabster.com not mapster. I wish it was. Thanks for all the input so far, still looking for more people to appraise them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom