fussyfever said:
I happen to have very high quailty .name keywords with a large presents in google and overture in light of that there still worth zero
Mm, hm. Worth/value. Maybe you're thinking too much here. Were I to own 20 .bz names (which I don't), and told someone that their "computer.bz" was worth "zero" (not "reg fee" but "ZERO"), I would give myself a sidewards glance.

At the very least I would point to the keyword as the damning factor (noting that all my names have much better keywords regarding the extension). I think its worth distinguishing "reg fee" from "zero value", if for no reason than clearing up any questions regarding relatively low value appraisals.
Also, personally I think purchasing .name's according to OVT and Google values alone would be a misguided approach. According to the requirements, at the very least, they need to refer to a fictional character or alias or risk a challenge. I have a little cartoon puppy named "Nexus". My plan is to add two more characters to my mascot grab bag. :wink:
Addendum: 1111s1s1s1s11s1s1s1s11s1s.com is not registered. If it were, apparently it was worth reg fee for somebody (unless they got it for free or the purchaser was using the name as a "test"). I believe there are times when a registered name is not worth "reg fee", but usually it involves the cases above, or the buyer was working off of bad information when making the purchase.
~ Nexus