Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

For Sale assume weak name because of previous owner?

Status
Not open for further replies.

March2005

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
406
Reaction score
0
There was a dot net that I was watching and it expired. Since the previous owner was that/those infamous CapitolDomains, LLC / Q40HFS.COM / DomainCar person/people, does that mean that the domain name is not worth registering because they seemingly tested it and found it lacking in traffic and buyers?
 

actnow

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
4,865
Reaction score
10
If they didn't keep it, it means that their calculations suggest they will not make enough
ppc revenue to cover the cost, overhead and profit margin.

If you are only buying it for the potential traffic and revenue, I doubt it will cover
your cost.

As for being a potential buyer for the domain, that can not be calculated in the
algorithm.

Also, there are some seasonality to domains that needs to be considered -
ChristmasPresent, EasterBunny, tulips, etc.
 

katherine

Country hopper
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
1,292
I am often registering names rejected by domaincar aka domibot aka unasi etc.
If you think the domain has potential based on name alone grab it.
You should not expect a lot of traffic but many of my names cover at least reg fee with traffic and revenue.
Traffic can come and go anyway.
The grace period exploited by domaincar et al is only 5 days, which can be enough to test traffic but not enough to find buyers (unless you spam a lot of people of course like webnamesolutions).
 

RatherGood

DNF Member
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2002
Messages
454
Reaction score
1
March2005 said:
There was a dot net that I was watching and it expired. Since the previous owner was that/those infamous CapitolDomains, LLC / Q40HFS.COM / DomainCar person/people, does that mean that the domain name is not worth registering because they seemingly tested it and found it lacking in traffic and buyers?



If you register expired names based only on their strength as a name and not traffic then this can be a good thing. "Domain tasters" seem to beat out snapnames/pool/enom on a lot of names only to drop them a few days later... this practice is definately out of hand but it has saved me a lot of money.
 

actnow

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
4,865
Reaction score
10
NameJet said:
"Domain tasters" seem to beat out snapnames/pool/enom on a lot of names only to drop them a few days later

Give me a break!!!!

Generally, the tasters only have 1, 2, or 3 credentials each. I would speculate
that they only have 15 credentials catching at drops.

Whereas, Enom, Pool and Snapnames have over 500 credentials chasing the
drops.

It is a pure accident if the tasters catch it if the big boys are shooting for it.
 

March2005

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
406
Reaction score
0
Here is an update:

After DomainCar had it for 5 days, it became available for registration for about 21 minutes. Then the infamous KenyaTech people registered it for 5 days and then let it go. The domain name is still available for registration today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom