Being threatened by a cheerleader...lol

[JuniperPark]

Ummm... Okay. I agree with someone's opinion.

Standard speech #342:

Welcome to the legal issues forum. Here members discuss legal issues. I enjoy these discussions, and I keep the forum on a browser tab in order to provide pithy, and once in a while informative, comments from time to time. As stated often here, I reserve the right to be sarcastic, and that is my "fee" for invoking the presence of this particular demon here.

One informative comment I frequently make is that lawyers are encouraged by the ethics code to devote at least some of their time to the public good by, for example, educating the public about the law. Did I say "'Welcome to the legal issues forum' already?

Another thing the ethics code provides is that specific legal advice is subject to rules of confidentiality, and is privileged against discovery. That second part means that, even though you might say a number of damaging things to your lawyer while consulting in confidence, nothing you say to your lawyer in private could be used against you. Of course, anything you say to your lawyer in public, for example on an internet message board, would ever be considered confidential. For a lawyer to encourage people to talk about their specific actual legal problems on an internet message board would be a bad thing for that lawyer to do. That lawyer might be considered to be inducing people to harm themselves by saying things, or saying things in a way, that might actually harm those people, since their words would be used against them by a motivated opponent. That lawyer would not be a good lawyer.

Translation:

John wants to see cheerleader porn, too. Please hurry, we're all off to Vegas for Pubcon on Monday.

 

[JMJ]

I had a simlar threat in a very similar situation from a someone over there in the UK. He gawked at my asking price and stated he would file a trademark there and take me to court before he paid that price. A few days later I sold it to the owner of the - version of my name. After the deal was done I replied back telling him goodluck in his reverse hijacking now. They have no chance in hell of winning on a acronym. If you were trying to sell them bcacheerleaders I can see where he could even think he had a chance in hell but you didn't.

It's funny how these people become so concerned with their trademarks in these situtations. If they were so concerned why isn't their lawyer already on it? They don't even own http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=bca.co.uk

BTW My vote is k: on the cheerleaders aswell. :-D

 

[Dave Zan]

To which I replied I would counter sue and still see no basis for his attitude.

If the other party is indeed going to Court over this, imagine how much you'd
possibly spend doing the same and enforcing it in another part of the globe.
Unless, of course, you see it as a challenge. :-D

Anyway, there are a few 3-letter UDRPs you could use as a sample. Same as
others: I doubt the other party has a leg to stand on, legal or otherwise save
for those they use for walking.