• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

closed Blogerist.com

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.

ClaireB

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I thought that I coined this new word but upon searching google I see that it is becoming a common expression. Doln't you think this could also be a brand name? What do you appraise it for? Thanks.
 
I'd sit on it for awhile and try to use the phrase as frequently and publicly as possibly.

Currently mid $xx-low $xxx

-G
 
Hi,

First, the word would require two g's.

So working with bloggerist --

The “-ist” suffix can mean “a specialist in a specific area,” e.g. a geologist.

Thus, deconstructing your word – bloggerist – can give us the following definition: “One who Bloggers.”

That does not make sense (although it is kind of funny – I mean, we can all “blogger” from time to time – especially on bad days!)

Blogger, without a suffix, already means “one who blogs.” We thus get some heavy redundancy here.

A better constructed word along these lines would be "bloggist."

I don't see any value in blogerist (or bloggerist).

Good luck
 
Google:
1 for Blogerist
11,500 for Blooger
88,800 for Bloger
21,000,000 for Blogger

Hope this helps give you an idea of the value, and the direction of the site, if you develop it.
 
Kevin said:
Hi,

First, the word would require two g's.

So working with bloggerist --

The “-ist” suffix can mean “a specialist in a specific area,” e.g. a geologist.

Thus, deconstructing your word – bloggerist – can give us the following definition: “One who Bloggers.”

That does not make sense (although it is kind of funny – I mean, we can all “blogger” from time to time – especially on bad days!)

Blogger, without a suffix, already means “one who blogs.” We thus get some heavy redundancy here.

A better constructed word along these lines would be "bloggist."

I don't see any value in blogerist (or bloggerist).

Good luck
I would have to agree with Kevin's analysis on this one (another G1 Kevin).

With 'Bloggist' gone, this boils-down to being a typo (if you will) of a rarely used blog term with pretty low potential - therefore valued at reg fee imo.

I like your approach thou - just a little off the mark with this name.

GL with you domaining!
 
Mr. Deleted said:
Google:
1 for Blogerist
11,500 for Blooger
88,800 for Bloger
21,000,000 for Blogger

Hope this helps give you an idea of the value, and the direction of the site, if you develop it.


As Golom says if I use it often enough, it has a chance to becoming a typed in word, i.e. having others adopt its spelling. My calculation is that if bloger (one "g") is used 88,800 times probably blogerist with time will be sought.

Thanks everyone for your input.

Claire
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom