closed Channel11 .com - 231 w/ext overture

[Sarah]

Indeed it does set a precedent in that it was a case based on a domain almost exactly like yours

However the parameters of the complainant and what the complainant was accusing of does not hold water with Channel 11 . There is no similar possible trademark holder of any sort for the string "Channel11' in and of itself. There was for "Channel5' in and of itself ( hence the phrase "in and of itself) .

Again, that case holds no water to anything regarding "Channel11.com" simply because there is no trademark holder for the phrase "Channel11'..

There is no precedence whatsoever between the two .. All because the names may "look" similar does not mean the legalities are similar.. That is what you need to understand..

.

 

[jdk]

$12,000+ Nice name

 

[NameGuy]

That is what you need to understand..

I understand perfectly. You do not understand my point or want to accept it.

And, I am on your side.

Good luck with the domain.

 

[Jeffreyw]

There are lots of Channel11 in this world. Worth x,xxx$

 

[Sarah]

.
Thanks nameguy for your comments.. And thanks to all for the many appraisals on the url .

.