- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
- Messages
- 863
- Reaction score
- 323
ICANN published new Universal Acceptance guidelines this week, and it reminded me of an issue from the early new-gTLD days.
Some websites used to reject perfectly valid longer extensions because their checks were built around short TLDs like .com or .org.
Has anyone seen a recent case where a buyer, client, or end user could not use a valid newer TLD on a website or online service?
ICANN source:
Some websites used to reject perfectly valid longer extensions because their checks were built around short TLDs like .com or .org.
Has anyone seen a recent case where a buyer, client, or end user could not use a valid newer TLD on a website or online service?
ICANN source: