• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Domain Name Privacy

Status
Not open for further replies.

HolySmoke

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi,
As I am based in the U.K. I have been using HeartIntenet, and to be fair their costs have been reasonable and the service quite good.
I recently reg'd a .mobi with Godaddy [they are much cheaper for this] and they offered a "privacy" service so that my home address didn't appear on "whois"
I then asked HeartInternet if they could offer similar service[for.com etc] and they replied it was "illegal" under domain name law to do this.
Further more as ownership couldn't be proved then there was a serious risk of loosing the name.
They both can't be right,So who is????
Thanks.:yo:
 
There are different approaches to privacy. Some of these schemes aren't very clever, but claiming they are "illegal" doesn't seem very clever either.

Maybe you'll find some answers here:
http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?t=194957

Mail forwarding wasn't illegal last time I checked, neither was the usage of companies to hold property, rights, or domains; even the use of trustees or licensing/leaseback schemes should be fully legal if executed properly.

It all depends on your needs, but if you merely want to control and use a domain, you needn't be the registrant of record personally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom