• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

domaining is secure for investing ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dhara

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi,


After the ICANN new strategy, as a domainer, Is it secure for investing in domain.


What are you think about this matter.
 
dhara, domaining is like any other business or investment, it changes constantly depending on social, economic, and legislative changes. With regard to ICANN authorising the new extensions (which is what I am assuming you are referring to) this will have little to no impact in the short term (i.e 0-2 years), in the medium term (2-5 years) it may affect certain markets within the domaining sphere somewhat, but these are likely to be high-end domains and high-value advertising niches (insurance, banking, real estate, etc.), rather than low-middle ranking domains. As for the long term (5+ years) I would not like to give an opinion based on anything but a gut reaction, and even a gut reaction tells me that again it will not significantly alter the market.

The reason that I see high-end domains and high-earning niches being affected more than low-middle ranking names is that these domains by there very nature are valued in the $xxx,xxx - $xx,xxx,xxx range, this therefore means that to start up a 'private' suffix becomes 'more' viable with regard to cost than it obviously does with lower-middle ranking domains.

A lot is being said about new geo-suffixes, here I see a few may be proposed and supported by individuals or groups of 'angel investors', but I do not see a threat to geo-gTLDs at all, the history of .la supports this. The suffix .la although being the national suffix for Laos was acquired and marketed fairly widely to the circa 9-10million people of Los Angeles as 'their' suffix, it has failed miserably to be taken as such. (This failure to get .la accepted may 'though' be due to very poor marketing, but that does not change the outcome.)

All in all I see no problems caused by the new gTLDs to the majority of the domaining market. Yes it is a change in the environment but not a massive change that will result in the culling of areas of the market.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
Any investment carries some risk but I think there is a lot of upside with domain names.
At least if you invest in real extensions. I'm not talking about the upcoming contenders that will almost all fail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom