• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Eliot Spitzer Files UDRP to Take EliotSpitzer.Com

Status
Not open for further replies.

rcade

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer appears to have begun a UDRP to take the domain names eliotspitzer.com and eliotspitzer.org away from Eric Keller, a New Jersey online candy retailer who registered them in 2001.

The domains are parked today, but archived web pages from the Internet Wayback Machine indicate that eliotspitzer.com was used for several years to direct traffic to eBulkCandy.com LLC, a candy retailer based in Trenton, N.J.

On Dec. 5, Keller was indicted by the Department of Justice on 10 counts of mail fraud for allegedly bilking UPS out of charges for candy shipments:

"From September 22, 2001 through February 2005, Keller created a series of bogus UPS shipping accounts for the purpose of shipping candy to ebulkcandy customers, and failed to pay UPS for the shipping. The indictment alleges that at the time Keller opened the UPS accounts, he had no intention of paying UPS for shipping services. According to the charges, defendant Eric Keller defrauded UPS of approximately $154,581."

He faces up to 200 years imprisonment and a $2.5 million fine.

In 2003, Keller was sued in Illinois by Brach's Confections for cybersquatting and trademark infringement over nine domains that incorporated Brach's into their names: brach.us, brachcandy.com, brachs.net, brachs.org, brachscandies.com, brachscandy.net, brachsconfections.com, brachsoutlet.com and brachswholesale.com.

Where the UDRP is concerned, I'm curious whether Spitzer can show that he's used his name in commerce as a mark.

I put more about this on my blog, Workbench, which is linked in my SIG. Hope that's not a violation of forum rules.
 
Where the UDRP is concerned, I'm curious whether Spitzer can show that he's used his name in commerce as a mark.

We'll have to wait and see. If he learned anything from the HillaryClinton.com
UDRP, then he might...might...just win.

He can also sue in court if he hasn't already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom