There are members here and on the other forums that are using .ws names successfully. It's up to them if they want to tell people about it. It's all about search traffic, and not about url-bar typeins. I agree with you about the solid keywords of course. That's what it's all about with search traffic. Rather than using a low level/quality com as a header, it's about using a top industry or product keyword for direct related backlinks that incourages relevance rating. An example would be Computer.ws (for Computer Website) much more brandable and memorable than Computerwhatever123.com, less letters, and a good header for all the computer keyword typo directed traffic.Stoc,
Which .ws names are making good revenue? It seems just a waste to register these names unless it's a solid, generic keyword. just my two cents.
Nolz
There are members here and on the other forums that are using .ws names successfully. It's up to them if they want to tell people about it. It's all about search traffic, and not about url-bar typeins. I agree with you about the solid keywords of course. That's what it's all about with search traffic. Rather than using a low level/quality com as a header, it's about using a top industry or product keyword for direct related backlinks that incourages relevance rating. An example would be Computer.ws (for Computer Website) much more brandable and memorable than Computerwhatever123.com, less letters, and a good header for all the computer keyword typo directed traffic.
People need to get past the commie mentality that if it doesn't have direct url bar type in traffic, that the name has no value. With all the worthwhile generic traffic coms now being gone for some time, is it a surprise that we see more trademark squatting? So many just want to take the easier road to a buck rather than putting some effort into a site. That makes our little industry look bad and hurts us all in the end.
Buy a decent .ws and build a site.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators