• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Finally the verdict is out on .xxx

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought this was shut down a long long time ago? :confused:
 
I haven't been following this issue but it occurs to me that forcing porn to the .xxx would offer certain filtering advantages (which are needed). Although, this would be pointless unless similar legislation also prohibited (fined) adult material in the .com space. You'd have to drive all porn from .com to the .xxx domain. This would be difficult to enforce, maybe impossible.
 
passing a .xxx extension to adult rated websites would have had an impact (sensoring) but since the bid was rejected we'll wait for another time. But i still don't see why they approved of a .tel extension for contact informmation management yet rejected .xxx. The ruling is ridiculous in my opinion and calls for the need for ICANN to become an independent body not under the US Federal direction! Perhaps the UN or other overaching body would do the job better?
 
Abraham said:
The ruling is ridiculous in my opinion and calls for the need for ICANN to become an independent body not under the US Federal direction! Perhaps the UN or other overaching body would do the job better?

Yes, it is ridiculous and I think it is very clear
that the 'decision' had little to do with the
merits (or not) of the .xxx extension...

Regrettably, money and power influences
EVERY decision of this type and I don't think
that the UN would, necessarily, do a 'better'
job.

This was not an ext'n I would have gone for,
but you can't help feeling for the guy who lost
a fortune in sponsoring it! (maybe he should've
'greased a few palms' beforehand?).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom