• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Frank Schilling Loses loses generic name on aweful UDRP decision

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe there is a problem with the registrar transferring the domain.

Gee, I wonder who owns the registrar?

No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.
 
Lets hope it makes a difference..

I subscribe to the WIPO lists, and I have to say the decisions are questionable. The financial incentive for Panelists to find in favour of the complainant is astounding.. I appreciate that they declare impartiality, but still.. if they were not to be complainant supportive then the complainants would not chose them..

The principle of the UDRP is sound, the execution however is flawed.
 
No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.

Can I ask you in what court and jurisdiction the lawsuit was filed?
 
No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.

I wasn't suggesting that anyone was flouting the UDRP. I guess what I meant to suggest was that the registrar had a small amount of discretion to hold the domain in cases where the UDRP was clearly erroneous and where there was a pending lawsuit.

The existence of the lawsuit clarifies it all. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom