Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name News
Google is No Show at UDRP; Still Wins Dispute
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clasione" data-source="post: 2272588" data-attributes="member: 7673"><p><em>"PARTIES Complainant is <strong>Social Status, Inc.</strong> (“Complainant”), California, USA. Respondent is DNS Admin / Google Inc. (“Respondent”), California, USA. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <<strong>socialstatus.com</strong>>, registered with MarkMonitor Inc. Having not established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel concludes that relief shall be DENIED."</em></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1767435.htm" target="_blank"><em><strong>Read the full case and decision at http://www.adrforum.com</strong></em></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clasione, post: 2272588, member: 7673"] [I]"PARTIES Complainant is [B]Social Status, Inc.[/B] (“Complainant”), California, USA. Respondent is DNS Admin / Google Inc. (“Respondent”), California, USA. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <[B]socialstatus.com[/B]>, registered with MarkMonitor Inc. Having not established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel concludes that relief shall be DENIED."[/I] [URL='http://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1767435.htm'][I][B]Read the full case and decision at http://www.adrforum.com[/B][/I][/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name News
Google is No Show at UDRP; Still Wins Dispute
Top
Bottom