• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Google To continue to monitize porn

Status
Not open for further replies.

BonkersTwo

DNF Newbie
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Good News for vaxis and all those people who keeps bidding on porn domains at snapnames in the past 2 days.
 
Would be interesting to know the reasons behind the initial decision...and what changed to cause the reversal.

BTW, welcome Bonkers.
 
Are you the same bonkerstwo on snapnames? :eek:
 
Hi :)

I'm not into adult, but I'm glad to see it's possible to change a giant's mind, and achieve something for the common good.
 
got something to do with unclesam.com.
 
I think Google realized how much revenue they were going to lose. Porn is definitely not going anywhere, it is here to stay! Btw welcome Bonkerstwo!
 
google didn't want to loose all the buisness to yahoo.
 
that is too bad. I would be happy if yahoo was alone in this business
 
that is too bad. I would be happy if yahoo was alone in this business


why?
 
because from my experience parking with yahoo feed pays more than google, and if google is out of the way in this niche then obviously yahoo gets more advertisers which will drive the bids up, increasing the revenue of our adult names.
 
were do you park your adult names? at parked.com? do you have samples of their templates?
 
Would be interesting to know the reasons behind the initial decision...and what changed to cause the reversal.

Money.

And probably the shock of seeing how much of their profit pie was actually from porn. Cause you know, the internet is for porn.
 
I'd be guessing here, but I reckon it was one of those "belief" issues. At least now they can say "well.... we tried it and we lost $X in revenue". I wonder if this means porn "is not evil?"

For those that don't know... the Google mantra has long been "dont do evil".

:hippie:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom