Perhaps it is just me (although I'm betting draggar is probably in at least partial agreement), but given the Google charter regarding information and data, unless you are just looking for a repository for all your MP3 / large media files, it strikes me as borderline insane to be putting information on their drives (or those of any external online drive company).
There are two darn good reasons to want to avoid this; first, and far away the most important, the security of my information. As soon as I pass my information to some other entity (especially if it is free), what is mine, certainly becomes theirs (disclaimers aside) too. This strikes me as a very bad thing for me and a boone for them.
Second, drive mechs are pretty darn cheap these days. In 1996 I paid something like $1,000 for a 1 gb scsi drive. These days, I can get a 1 tb drive for a fraction of that cost. Why would I want to compromise data of a personal or business nature to a drive service?
I entirely agree with the post comment "I would refuse to consider them serious tech sites if they really think this" as regards "tech" sites supporting this idea.
Do I have a GMail, Yahoo or other free email service accounts? Sure. What goes through them? Generally speaking, not anything I am doing related to any serious business activities. I have never shared these addresses on any web site, yet the addresses are used for more and more spam activity as dutifully reported by their respective spam filters. Do you wonder why I am more that a bit doubtful about how my drive data would be any further protected?
-Commerce