-
Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Has a Respondent ever won using a insant (Benlux) TM?
- Thread starter Steen
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Messages
- 2,589
- Reaction score
- 24
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0847.html
Here, Respondent admits that the Tunisia registration was obtained merely to protect his interests in the domain name. Respondent is not located in Tunisia and the registration was not obtained for the purpose of making bona fide use of the mark in commerce in Tunisia. A Tunisian trademark registration is issued upon application without any substantive examination. Although recognized by certain treaties, registration in Tunisia does not prevent a finding of infringement in jurisdictions outside Tunisia. Under the circumstances, some might view Respondentâs Tunisian registration itself as evidence of bad faith because it appears to be a pretense to justify an abusive domain name registration. We find at a minimum that it does not evidence a legitimate interest in the disputed name under the circumstances of this case.
Here, Respondent admits that the Tunisia registration was obtained merely to protect his interests in the domain name. Respondent is not located in Tunisia and the registration was not obtained for the purpose of making bona fide use of the mark in commerce in Tunisia. A Tunisian trademark registration is issued upon application without any substantive examination. Although recognized by certain treaties, registration in Tunisia does not prevent a finding of infringement in jurisdictions outside Tunisia. Under the circumstances, some might view Respondentâs Tunisian registration itself as evidence of bad faith because it appears to be a pretense to justify an abusive domain name registration. We find at a minimum that it does not evidence a legitimate interest in the disputed name under the circumstances of this case.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2003
- Messages
- 4,853
- Reaction score
- 1
Thank you Mr. Berryhill.
I find this part particularly interesting: Respondent admits that the Tunisia registration was obtained merely to protect his interests in the domain name
I wonder if they would have drawn the same conclusion if there was no such admission? Probably.
I find this part particularly interesting: Respondent admits that the Tunisia registration was obtained merely to protect his interests in the domain name
I wonder if they would have drawn the same conclusion if there was no such admission? Probably.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2003
- Messages
- 4,853
- Reaction score
- 1
I wouldn't mind spending my time in The Antilles. I wonder if that counts.
- Status
Similar threads
