closed iHealthy.com

[hockey]

Looking for appraisals and feedback on the value of iHealthy.com.

Thanks

 

[stock_post]

looks like a nice domain - not sure on the value.

 

[dcristo]

i don't really like it tbh i think the y kills the value.

 

[brian1234]

A good name. I say the value on this one is mid $x,xxx
and upwards...

Good luck,

 

[dcristo]

really? i think getting that would be close to winning the lottery with this name.

IAmHealthy.com is much better than this even though it's longer.

who's the end user for this name? imo it's a developer, and most in this current climate wouldn't pay close to mid 4 figures.

just imho.

 

[brian1234]

really? i think getting that would be close to winning the lottery with this name.

IAmHealthy.com is much better than this even though it's longer.

who's the end user for this name? imo it's a developer, and most in this current climate wouldn't pay close to mid 4 figures.

just imho.

Hiya,

I respect your opinion, of course. mid $x,xxx+ is based
on the fact that the Heath and Fitness industry on the
web is very large indeed, and the domain, whilst not a
top tier name for the industry, is still pretty good.

IAmHealthy.com, in my view, is a much weaker domain
than iHealthy.com, and the end user for this name could
be any one of a thousand existing firms or start-up's,
incl. estab'd co's that are already using the "i" prefix
successfully in other site types that they own.

Most of my "valuations" are geared more toward end-user
prices, as I feel it is important on appraisals to give some
hope/optimism to op's, where it is merited.

Cheers,

 

[hockey]

Thanks for the feedback. dcristo, I wish it didn't have the y or even the i

I figure there is some value in it, nearly all the gTLD's are taken.

 

[dcristo]

Don't get me wrong I think it's decent just not "premium" is all. iHealth.com good iHealthy.com not so good. If you look at what corporate companies with TV campaigns are using, a lot of the time it's call to action or brandable domains I just can't see that much interest in this besides developers but I may be way off the mark.

I don't really get Brian's logic above in that if "i" portfolio domain owners would be interested in the name, makes it more valuable. I see it the other way. I think if the end users are limited only to them it hurts more than it helps although I guess it helps to identify who the enduser would be.