- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 0
Given the importance of this issue, can this thread be made "sticky" - mods?
-
Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Important: Tiered Pricing Battle Again At ICANN
- Thread starter GeorgeK
- Start date
- Status
We already pay ICANN a fee on every domain purchase. We dont need an extra tax, we actually should be getting a refund.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 1,584
- Reaction score
- 6
Thanks for the information, hope that the right thing happens in the end 
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,426
- Reaction score
- 1,292
We need a Tea Party :tongue1:
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2007
- Messages
- 7,357
- Reaction score
- 223
That only means that the corporation isn't there to make a profit. It means nothing about the salaries for those who work there.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 10
It seems News is now more about Auctions, as IMO, DNForum is no longer 'The Place to Talk Domains', or the community it was - but just a business to make money off of while taking advantage of those who come here.
Unfortunately, Making money is now more important to DNF, imo, than building a community. I would include an Example, but Admin keeping deleting my Threads, as they don't want people to know their practices. (If anyone wants an Example, they can PM me anytime.) It was the excesses of capitalism that burst the global Greed Bubble - I hope DNF reconsiders their approach and doesn't continue to follow the same path, and ruin DNF just for a dollar.
IMO, if DNF was proud of their services, being transparent wouldn't be an issue - instead of trying to mask their actions and with-holding the truth from the members here - the members who built and made DNF what it is.
...and to the subject at hand - in the good ol' days of DNF - this Thread would be front and center to DNFs members - but now, it's all about DNF making money. I guess this Subject doesn't make DNF any money.
Thanks George for your dedication to the Community!
[DNF needs more Barack Obama - not George W. Bush.]
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
After a more detailed review, I've added additional comments on the new gTLD draft documents at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00026.html
There are only 2 weeks remaining to submit public comments. Go to:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
scroll down, and widen your browser to see the email addresses for comments (on the right of your screen) and existing comments (on the far right of your screen). There are 7 different comment areas (i.e. the total guide, or each module).
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00026.html
There are only 2 weeks remaining to submit public comments. Go to:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
scroll down, and widen your browser to see the email addresses for comments (on the right of your screen) and existing comments (on the far right of your screen). There are 7 different comment areas (i.e. the total guide, or each module).
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 0
That was funny, but can they spell IQ?
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
ICANN just posted a misleading document, regarding the pricing issue. See my comments at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00046.html
The comment period has been extended by a week, so hopefully that gives everyone time to post against this bad proposal. To do so, go to:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00046.html
The comment period has been extended by a week, so hopefully that gives everyone time to post against this bad proposal. To do so, go to:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
George thanks for being on top of the matter. I recently sent my comment in. I think there is a apathetic nature to situations like this. Every domainer who activity makes a living or perceives that they will should help George in his effort to monitor ICANN and its policies. Its always fun to talk about what the next big thing is or how much you sold something for. But before you get too involved in holiday activities, spend 30 mins and make a contribution to the comments. Here are my comment which should post to ICANN soon. If you make a comment, i think it would be nice to copy it here to help others with theirs comments...
Here is my response:
 I want to comment on the language related to price controls on new or existing tlds. Any extension created with the ability to sell to the public requires regulated price controls to maintain a stable environment for domain names and all its related commerce.
The protection that price controls provides is two-fold. One is that it protects the general domain name registrant against fraudulent pricing strategies that a registry and its registrars may try to employ. It also protects the actual registry and it registrars from themselves. Effectively allowing free reign may create addition situations where an extension destroys it marketability through tiered pricing schemes.
If Pandoraâs Box is opened to tiered pricing or no price caps, abuse is most likely to happen and when it does, a litigious environment will ensue against the registries and probably ICANN itself. Tiered pricing relegated to a country code is different than with extensions with business on it with years of commercial activity vested within it.
If new gtlds are to exist then at least administer them responsibly and to effect of why your organization is in existence.
Here is my response:
 I want to comment on the language related to price controls on new or existing tlds. Any extension created with the ability to sell to the public requires regulated price controls to maintain a stable environment for domain names and all its related commerce.
The protection that price controls provides is two-fold. One is that it protects the general domain name registrant against fraudulent pricing strategies that a registry and its registrars may try to employ. It also protects the actual registry and it registrars from themselves. Effectively allowing free reign may create addition situations where an extension destroys it marketability through tiered pricing schemes.
If Pandoraâs Box is opened to tiered pricing or no price caps, abuse is most likely to happen and when it does, a litigious environment will ensue against the registries and probably ICANN itself. Tiered pricing relegated to a country code is different than with extensions with business on it with years of commercial activity vested within it.
If new gtlds are to exist then at least administer them responsibly and to effect of why your organization is in existence.
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
The comment period ends on Monday. If you were waiting until the last moment to post comments, that time is now.
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
Just a couple of hours left to post comments.
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm
(scroll down, widen your browser, and the comment addresses are at the right, and existing comments at the far right; when you send an emailed comment, you'll get an email that contains a link that you must click to validate your comment, i.e. to demonstrate it's not spam)
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- Messages
- 30,303
- Reaction score
- 2,217
It's worth mentioning that giant Adobe is opposing to the introduction of new TLD's by ICANN in this letter.
- Joined
- May 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,190
- Reaction score
- 9
what is quite reasonable
but this thread is supposed to be about the .tv-style pricing for .com (old gTLDs)
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
Neustar is on record now as desiring removing of price caps on .biz names, if other new gTLDs get it. See their comments in the PDF of:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00139.html
"In the event that price caps are not included for the new gTLDs, NeuStar believes that price caps must be removed from the .biz registry agreement." (bottom of page 8)
Still a couple of hours left, for those waiting until the last minute to comment.
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00139.html
"In the event that price caps are not included for the new gTLDs, NeuStar believes that price caps must be removed from the .biz registry agreement." (bottom of page 8)
Still a couple of hours left, for those waiting until the last minute to comment.
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 80
Well, if they could charge more for sex.biz, porn.biz, hotels.biz, games.biz, etc., they could make more money, albeit with a much smaller registration base, just like .tv.
While they may or may note kill themselves, they would definitely kill anyone currently owning a "premium" .biz domain, assuming they would charge them higher renewals.
("premium" in quotes, given I personally think .biz is junk, and I own not a single .biz domain name)
- Status
