All Afilias has done with .info is recognise the market.
In any extension there are probably at most 100 very valuable names
There are then around 1000 tier 1 names
Around 10,000 very nice names
Around 100,000 names which may deliver $100 without putting the effort into developing (what names are really for obvious but worth mentioning)
Around 1,000,000 names worth a $10 reg. fee
Now what do you do with the rest of the potential names?
Leave the reg. fee at $10 and get a steady drip of registrants? or?
Drop the fee to $1 offer a free for first year (Like with a property lease?)
The problem with totally free some companies took advantage using a numbers game.
A $1 fee solves this.
All extensions will be priced this way once market forces kick in.
How many of the 33,000,000 or so .com registrations are worth a $10 reg. fee undeveloped?
In any extension there are probably at most 100 very valuable names
There are then around 1000 tier 1 names
Around 10,000 very nice names
Around 100,000 names which may deliver $100 without putting the effort into developing (what names are really for obvious but worth mentioning)
Around 1,000,000 names worth a $10 reg. fee
Now what do you do with the rest of the potential names?
Leave the reg. fee at $10 and get a steady drip of registrants? or?
Drop the fee to $1 offer a free for first year (Like with a property lease?)
The problem with totally free some companies took advantage using a numbers game.
A $1 fee solves this.
All extensions will be priced this way once market forces kick in.
How many of the 33,000,000 or so .com registrations are worth a $10 reg. fee undeveloped?