Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Diamond Forums
Is backlink still important for SEO?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnandme" data-source="post: 2235686" data-attributes="member: 322950993"><p>Even though Matt Cutts said backlink would become a little less important in SEO, but I myself don't believe that</p><p></p><p>The question is how Google ranks websites? it relies on content? I'm sure any Seach Engines likes a lovely content. But how can search engines distinguish a good content from another? I don't think search engines are so emotional enough to realize better, exellent or worse content</p><p></p><p>Search Engines are just a machine, they're not a human, so I think it doesn't have a feeling about content.</p><p></p><p>In fact, Google owns some instruments, that helps google understand how visitors think about sites. Google Analytics can determine users' behavior on sites. But I think google may not know satisfaction exactly. This is the difference between human reading and Google search engine reading.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What happens if so many sites contain equivalent quality content, equivalent bounce rate, time on site, pageviews...? So what is crucial factor to keyword ranking? that's backlink</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another question! why did Matt Cutts try to lower the role of backlink in SEO? Because he wanted to prevent spammers who are getting spammy and spammy everywhere to get backlinks</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think the role of baclink would be lowered, it's always valuable for SEO , no matter how google's algorism changes.</p><p></p><p>I hope you can share your viewpoints to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnandme, post: 2235686, member: 322950993"] Even though Matt Cutts said backlink would become a little less important in SEO, but I myself don't believe that The question is how Google ranks websites? it relies on content? I'm sure any Seach Engines likes a lovely content. But how can search engines distinguish a good content from another? I don't think search engines are so emotional enough to realize better, exellent or worse content Search Engines are just a machine, they're not a human, so I think it doesn't have a feeling about content. In fact, Google owns some instruments, that helps google understand how visitors think about sites. Google Analytics can determine users' behavior on sites. But I think google may not know satisfaction exactly. This is the difference between human reading and Google search engine reading. What happens if so many sites contain equivalent quality content, equivalent bounce rate, time on site, pageviews...? So what is crucial factor to keyword ranking? that's backlink Another question! why did Matt Cutts try to lower the role of backlink in SEO? Because he wanted to prevent spammers who are getting spammy and spammy everywhere to get backlinks I don't think the role of baclink would be lowered, it's always valuable for SEO , no matter how google's algorism changes. I hope you can share your viewpoints to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Diamond Forums
Is backlink still important for SEO?
Top
Bottom