Nolz91 said:
the forum 'experts" here don't like them. The "pros" avoid them like the plague!
Those "experts" and "pros" just use a different revenue model (pure ppc, non developed, url bar type-in traffic) and there's nothing wrong with that of course. But there are other "Pros" who are very successful with a different (SEO developed, search bar type-in traffic) revenue model. Rather than valuing the domain on a multiple of the pure url bar type ins, the .ws domains should be valued on the keyword impact on SEO for a site (via related backlinks etc) and the revenue increase that may bring. Some "Pros" combine models using the main keyword .ws as their site title and directing typo or so-so coms there.
What are some examples of good keywords? I have only three .ws names. bimmer.ws, filet.ws, and punt.ws.
Like the .com traffic guys, you should still be looking for high bid ppc keywords (products and services), but the .ws names still offer decent single word industry names or brands that are financially viable solutions.
Some of the same arguments support other alt extensions as well, such as .US or .info or .biz. The problem comes when you lose some of the keyword value thru trying to force associations that don't fit.
WS works nicely promoted as "Website", and .CC as "Credit Card" or .TV as "television", but when you start trying to force things like Desks.org or Desks.cc or Desks.tv etc etc you're hurting people's heads and the domain value based on the keyword.