Lame Delegation

[Brujah]

Just a heads-up. Something to be watching.

Two names that I had snaps on, expired in 2000 sometime and have both been changed very recently.

The 2000 expiration dates had been extended another 2 years, so these names have a Dec 2002 expiration date instead of Dec 2000.

Anyone have an idea whats going on with these ?

 

Brujah,

I can assist in an explanation if you give me one of the names. It was possibly stolen, but I can check if you wish.

 

[Brujah]

I'm keeping an eye on the changes, will let you know what happens to the names when its no longer lame delegation.

 

Noticed the absence of a phone number and the 6 digit "code" too? DR's agreement, like others prohibits false Who Is data and they reserve the right to delete the domain. Clearly, there is a legal angle that is possible here.

 

[Brujah]

You're talking about the stolen names I think from the other thread ? Yeah, I've noticed those too.. no phone #, using free email addresses ( yahoo, excite, hotmail ), non-US address, 6 digit "code", and always with DotRegistrar ?

 

[RacerX]

got it Brujah.

You are the first to corroborate the 3 ton stinking elephant sitting in the middle of this forum...

 

[Whois-Search]

http://www.exody.com/lame/

members only

 

[Domain]

Originally posted by Whois-Search
http://www.exody.com/lame/

members only

What are LAME-DELEGATION.ORG domains? What is the significance of this?

Thanks

 

Lame delegation in this context appears to be a way to allow domains to be deleted when there are nameservers based on the domain, and there are still references to these nameservers from other domains...

-t