Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

List of UDRP's appealed to Court ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

domaingenius

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2006
Messages
1,281
Reaction score
10
This may be a very long shot question but does anyone know
of a list of UDRP decisions that have been appealed to
a Court, in any Country ?. Only one I know is the barcelona.com
case but must be more than that surely ?.

I am trying to see if anyone has done same as barcelona.com
in another Country, or any others at all really see whether
I can work out the best jurisdiction to grab to protect domains.

DG
 

Theo

Account Terminated
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
30,306
Reaction score
2,216
LH.com comes to mind.
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,588
Reaction score
23
"Appeal" is not quite the right word. As stated in UDRP 4(k), the point is to seek an independent adjudication.

There is a list of ones known to WIPO posted at their site.

Off the top of my head, court cases were filed after:

traditions.com
abt.com
lomonaco.com
buypc.com
freebies.com - (the judge in that case ripped the NAF panelist)


At the moment, I am aware of one pending in Arizona relative to aspis.com, in which the UDRP Complainant has been served, has not appeared, and a default motion against them is pending before the court.

A preliminary hearing was held today in the case pending relative to chillibeans.com.

It is quite typical in these cases for the Complainant to attempt to deny the jurisdiction to which they admitted in the Complaint, or simply not to show up.

There is a spate of cases relating to met-art.com pending in Luxembourg and Australia.
 

domaingenius

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2006
Messages
1,281
Reaction score
10
"Appeal" is not quite the right word. As stated in UDRP 4(k), the point is to seek an independent adjudication.

There is a list of ones known to WIPO posted at their site.

Off the top of my head, court cases were filed after:

traditions.com
abt.com
lomonaco.com
buypc.com
freebies.com - (the judge in that case ripped the NAF panelist)


At the moment, I am aware of one pending in Arizona relative to aspis.com, in which the UDRP Complainant has been served, has not appeared, and a default motion against them is pending before the court.

A preliminary hearing was held today in the case pending relative to chillibeans.com.

It is quite typical in these cases for the Complainant to attempt to deny the jurisdiction to which they admitted in the Complaint, or simply not to show up.

There is a spate of cases relating to met-art.com pending in Luxembourg and Australia.

Thanks very much for the info. Seems that this is the way to
go. I will read those cases and see is can find some more.

DG
 

Theo

Account Terminated
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
30,306
Reaction score
2,216
Thanks for the aspis.com update, Jonh. What is the timeframe for the finalization of the case; also, why Arizona?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 2) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom