• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

closed movieshowtimes.info

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.

elitedomains

New Member
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
873
Reaction score
1
I know .info domains are well behind .com or even org/net- in fact out of a 500 domain portfolio it's the only .info I own but just saw creditcard.info go for 2K on Sedo last week although I realize that domain is related to finance so probably is a premium for that one, however "movie showtimes" in quotation marks has 222 Million results on Google and is #7 in the world for "movie" on overture with 199141 searches last month.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&q="movie+showtimes"&btnG=Search

I welcome your opinions. Thanks for your 2 cents.
 
I like the name. The opinions of most is that the .info have less value due to search engines taking preference of the .coms, .nets & .orgs etc... I have put some .info, .us & .st domains up and they have grown in the search engines. I think that the reason that .coms are popular is that they were the first to be registered. As the other extension are being developed, they will gain equality. The only exception is the years registered. You can't get aroung that.

Just an opinion.

Good Luck with this one. Develop it and see what happens. Hard work produces results!
 
LOL- everything is for sale. Feel free to make an offer. I bought it initially to develop it but am too busy with other projects.

Like I said above- out of a 500 domain name portfolio this is the only .info I have and for that matter only have 4 or 5 .og's and .net's - I am a .com guy myself so I understand what the other poster said, however with the extreme amount of results in google and overture I felt I had to made an exception for this gem.
 
no much value as you've correctly pointed .info is not a gem. Worse still it has three words.
just my 2 cents
 
yea i like the name too but the matter is the .info
of my self i never wrote on the address bar .info
but i think it can be worth in the near future a thing may be a lot
good luck with this very nice name except the .info
 
Thanks refide.

Abraham, n/p - everyones two cents is welcome. Everyone is entitled to thier own opinions, however, as the saying goes, not everyone is entitled to thier own facts.

I see a German flag so it's understandable you would not know the intricacies of English, however, "showtimes" in English is absolutely, irrevocably, 1 word, not 2.

You can see for yourself when typing in "show times" in google, even THEY correct you saying "did you mean showtimes?"

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&q=show+times

As for the .info TLD, as mentioned before I am cognizant at this time they trail the value of thier .com counterpart but as I said above, creditcard.info just went for $2,000 on Sedo a few days ago so I would hardly call that "not much value" - If you disagree feel free to wire me 2K if you got it laying around taking up space. LOL
 
elitedomains said:
As for the .info TLD, as mentioned before I am cognizant at this time they trail the value of thier .com counterpart but as I said above, creditcard.info just went for $2,000 on Sedo a few days ago so I would hardly call that "not much value"

Correction, it sold for $20K. It falls into the $xxxx category only when developed, to a reseller perharps in the mid $xx onwards to low $xxx.
 
Do you have a price in mind?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom