- Joined
- Apr 28, 2002
- Messages
- 3,119
- Reaction score
- 1
"xzn.net" is registered with whois.nameking.com - Pool
-
Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
For Sale nameking.com >>>> Pool
- Thread starter Whois-Search
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2003
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 0
Thats 15...
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2003
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 0
Or 17 actually.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2003
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 0
Nope 18!
They've been busy. Very strangely. There MUST BE A REASON THEY ARE THIS CONFIDENT.
They've been busy. Very strangely. There MUST BE A REASON THEY ARE THIS CONFIDENT.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Messages
- 4,865
- Reaction score
- 10
Does it piss you off. Because, you have to pay to play?
I have reduced my bidding at Pool by 90%. The first tier names are going for a lot more than I am willing to pay.
However, I am infavor of the market determining prices. And, a monopoly will put most of us out of business. So, I would rather buy in a free market society.
I have reduced my bidding at Pool by 90%. The first tier names are going for a lot more than I am willing to pay.
However, I am infavor of the market determining prices. And, a monopoly will put most of us out of business. So, I would rather buy in a free market society.
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2003
- Messages
- 3,609
- Reaction score
- 1
Pool pisses me off because:
* We didn't need another bidding system
* Things started going downhill when they came along (they set the trend for everyone else to go to bidding systems)
* They are one of the main reasons why snap lose so many snaps; being that they are run by that former Snap executive.
* They keep taking all of snaps registrars
* They are arrogant
* They have a very sleazy affiliate program
* They try & make it sound good by promoting free backorders, when in all reality it's just another bidding system.
* They use a bidding model which they shouldn't be allowed to use; how they get the names & then let people bid for them.
That's just off the top of my head.
* We didn't need another bidding system
* Things started going downhill when they came along (they set the trend for everyone else to go to bidding systems)
* They are one of the main reasons why snap lose so many snaps; being that they are run by that former Snap executive.
* They keep taking all of snaps registrars
* They are arrogant
* They have a very sleazy affiliate program
* They try & make it sound good by promoting free backorders, when in all reality it's just another bidding system.
* They use a bidding model which they shouldn't be allowed to use; how they get the names & then let people bid for them.
That's just off the top of my head.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
- Messages
- 1,803
- Reaction score
- 2
I have SiteKing.com for sale if anyone is interested 
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
