closed New Scientific Technologies - NewScientificTechnologies.com

[geodic]

New Scientific Technologies - NewScientificTechnologies.com

Thoughts and appraisals, thanks.

 

[DN BROKER]

$0-Reg Fee

 

[Gerry]

Names like these are tough to nail in regards to value by the simple fact that they represent new and innovative technologies that are not mainstream - yet.

I love reading WIRED (have been a magazine subscriber since day one). Too many times that I care to remember, I regged names based on some of these new innovations. The biggest problem was not seeing immediate traffic or results to warrant keeping them in my portfolio. You have no idea how many of those I wish I had still owned.

Luckily, I have learned from my lessons and hung on to several. Names that were zilch two years ago not only get traffic now but offers as well.

If you are looking for a quick flip on this I doubt if it is going to happen. Its almost too broad of a term. With that said, it is perfect for a website because it is too broad...encompasses many topics that are not mainstream yet.

If you want to create a site, Look at places like WIRED and MIT sites to get an idea of how these new technologies are broken down into sub categories like energy, health, alternative fuels, bio chemistry and bio diversity and so on. Creating a well constructed site and marketing it properly would be the best usage of this name.

 

[WhoDatDog]

There is nothing that can happen that would create value. New Scientic Technologies will always be the same thing. This is not a name where the perception will change with time. Since the beginning of mankind there have been new scientific technologies, and there will continue to be until the end of time. That is different than registering a name where the perception of that name might change as technology advances, or as the world changes its perception. An example of those would be Green names (if you bought many years ago), or other alternative energy types of names. Those are the types of names that can be dynamic, even if, as a group, most people will strike out with those, too. But you have to buy them when there are worth ZERO, or close to it, since most will never take off.

This name is worth zero. I can prove it, too. Go run it though a thread and list it for sale here at Dn Forum. If you can buy yourself lunch with the proceeds then I will admit to being wrong on this name. There really is no other way to value a name other than what you can reasonably expect to get for it today. If you own shares in a company that are worth $15 per share today......that is what they are worth. If you are a good investor or speculator then your shares will be worth more at some future date, but today you will get 15 bucks per share. That's how it works, folks.

Try typing in NewScientificTechnologies.com 5 times in a row quickly without making a mistake. That is just one of its many problems which takes us all the way back the promised land, and that is ZERO.

 

[Gerry]

Try typing in NewScientificTechnologies.com 5 times in a row quickly without making a mistake.

Hmm, try bookmarking a site.

Takes all the guess work and potential mistakes out of the equation.

That's how it works, folks.

 

[WhoDatDog]

You miss the point completely. Not only is the name worth zero for numerous reasons, but you get the added bonus of an extremely long name that is very easy to mistype. You can shrug that off as not being important if you wish, but it will only cost you money in your own registrations if you disregard it. Better yet, let me know how much your offer was that you PM'd to the OP. That is how the game works, when someone lists a name with value people will PM trying to pick it up.

It is a garbage name.

 

[Gerry]

Did I make an overt or covert offer?

No.

Did I give it a high evaluation as a name.

No.

Did you read my post prior to you posting?

No.

That is how the game works, folks.

Don't bother stroke me on the potential for misspelling. As metioned, that is what bookmarks are for. Site potential is there. Long range potential is there.

For those of you looking for immediate gratification, the potential is not there.

As for the total bunk about extremely long names, properly done the name and the extension can be totally irrelevant in todays apps and touchscreen applications. Billions of people do not even know about nor care about the URL as long as the icon gets them to their destination. There are hardly any apps or icons existing on the smart phone or iPad that are precisely named as the icon would have one to believe.

Welcome to the world of irrelevancy and technologies where the URL will be inconsequential in the world of icons and apps.

Tell me, do you have no sites bookmarked on your computer? Your laptop? Your smartphone? Does not your browser auto-populate the URL when you start to type in the browser window.

YOU missed the point(s) completely. The entire notion of "typing it real fast 5 times" is the perhaps one of the most lamest and without merit valuations I have ever personally read on this forum. Type it once and be done with it.

 

[Biggie]

i'd say the name was redundant


because technology is science


newtechnology
latesttechnolgy
etc.

would be better


imo...

 

[katherine]

Yes, the name is redundant and the name being too long doesn't help. Verdict: autorenew = off or better yet, grace delete = on.