• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

New York-New York Wins Trademark suit Over Domain: newyorknewyork .com

Status
Not open for further replies.

companyone

DNF Regular
The Originals
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
12
Hi,

New York-New York wins trademark suit over Internet domain name


By: Steve Green ~ (Las Vegas Sun .com)

Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2010 | 4:04 p.m.
MGM Resorts International has won a trademark infringement lawsuit involving its New York-New York hotel-casino on the Las Vegas Strip, with MGM Resorts winning rights to the potentially valuable Internet domain name newyorknewyork .com.

Attorneys for MGM Resorts’ 2,024-room New York-New New York resort prevailed July 29 when U.S. District Judge Lloyd D. George in Las Vegas issued a default judgment against a company called NewYorkNewYork .com Inc.

The default judgment ordered that the website domain name be transferred to the casino company and that NewYorkNewYork .com Inc. pay the casino company $101,000 in damages – including $100,000 for violating the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

George’s ruling came in a lawsuit alleging "cybersquatting" that was filed in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas in November.

The hotel-casino company charged in the suit that the website of Tarzana, Calif., man Ronnie Katzin, using the phrase "New York New York," infringed on the Las Vegas hotel-casino's trademarks covering that name for resort and hotel services not provided in the city or state of New York; and for casino services.

The website last year included an image of the Las Vegas casino property, but New York-New York in its lawsuit complained there was no disclaimer that the website had no affiliation with the Las Vegas casino property.

The lawsuit alleged that when users clicked on a banner, they were not re-directed to the hotel's official Web site, www. nynyhotelcasino .com, but instead to a third-party Web site. That site enabled website users to book hotel reservations at the Las Vegas hotel-casino as well as competing Las Vegas hotels.

That, the hotel-casino charged, showed: "Defendants have and/or had a bad faith intent to profit from plaintiff's New York-New York marks."

Katzin, however, said last year that he obtained the website name in about 1996, before the hotel-casino opened, and that he obtained the name as part of his love for the Frank Sinatra song "New York, New York" and to develop a website promoting New York City.

SOURCE: MUCH MORE WITH WHOLE ARTICLE & LINKS


____

Peace!
Dan
 
Wait, so he linked to Expedia and that's what started the whole case?

So then is Expedia infringing??
 
Ouch....the guy made his bed putting up ads for hotels in vegas. Pretty dumb.
 
This is actually quite scary now that I think about it.

What if Expedia uses Adwords (I'm sure they do) and has a graphic ad though them.

I have Adsence on one of my sites and that image ad comes up - does this mean I'm infringing (on whoever's picture is being used) if the domain is similar to the ad?
 
This case has to be handled by Google..
They have more money than the Casino, so you are OK

This is actually quite scary now that I think about it.

What if Expedia uses Adwords (I'm sure they do) and has a graphic ad though them.

I have Adsence on one of my sites and that image ad comes up - does this mean I'm infringing (on whoever's picture is being used) if the domain is similar to the ad?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom