• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Prior owner fail to renew, existing contract involved

Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the legal standing of Party A, and possible legal implications/repercussions for Party A?

I'm not an attorney, so can't give legal advice, but will toss in my layman's opinion ...

You own the domain name free and clear; there's virtually no question about that assuming the domain "deleted" normally, which it appears it did from what you have explained.

Does Party B have any existing rights to have Party A return Domain Name X?

No, because the domain was deleted normally; deactivation itself, in effect, is a notice that something is wrong and needs to be addressed immediately... and importantly, much time passed - they had numerous opportunities to recover the domain prior to deletion.

Can Party C or Party B compell Party A to honor the contract between
Party B and Party C?

No.

What could happen if Party A sells the domain name to a forth party, Party D

Party A should disclose that they were contacted by Party B and explain the associated details to Party D.

In addition, Party A should consider requiring Party D to sign an contract that specifically indemnifies from Party A from legal action by Party B, C, and any associated others to those two parties.

In my view, Party A holding / using the domain presents virtually no risk in the situation you described ... however, there is a risk if selling such a domain while such a dispute exists unless various legal steps, as explained above, are taken.

Again, I'm not an attorney, but hope this info is helpful, nevertheless.

Ron
 
The whole thing sounds kind of nuts to me, why would party B just let it expire if they had a contract with party C. Surly party B knew they would get hit by party C, unless party C had TM rights on the domain name.

Kind of like getting the letter, saying don't use it but let it expire. Then I could see party B letting it expire, but no other way I could see it happen that way. And if that was the case, then party A would have to deal with party C anyway.

Also I guess party B, could of been pissed at party C. But still a dumb thing to let it expire, but some people do really dumb things. You never can tell these days, none the less I hope it works out for you ok.
 
The whole thing sounds kind of nuts to me, why would party B just let it expire if they had a contract with party C.

It could be anything. Party B got caught up with a gazillion things and forgot,
s/he's a crook and ran away with the money, etc.

And you also possibly answered your own question. :D

Who knows? Then again, who cares?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom