Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Interesting..so what you are saying is that privacy is'nt worth 2 shakes of a lambs tail when a name get's UDRP'd?
Interesting..so what you are saying is that privacy is'nt worth 2 shakes of a lambs tail when a name get's UDRP'd?
They can.I think he did....they can't sue him after a UDRP?
I think he did....they can't sue him after a UDRP?
And if he hands over the domain, complainant gets some of his money back. At least at WIPO he does.
I think you'll find this case interesting Focus,
Gaylord Entertainment Company v. Nevis Domains LLC
It applies to a private registration and has some interesting players were all familiar with, (Refer to "C. The Parked Domain and Respective Landing Pages)
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0523.html
I won the case re this domain name 13 months ago, why this action now?
Odd it would be frozen over a complaint, this sounds like legal action. That is why havimg a real contact email in a sensitive name's whois is better than completely private imo, leaves room to negotiate a hand over and no further action. jmo
Odd it would be frozen over a complaint
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.