Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Rob Monster wants to get Voc(a)l.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robmonster" data-source="post: 2344647" data-attributes="member: 143534"><p>WIPO and ADR were supposed to make the world work better -- a private dispute resolution protocol instead of using the court system. It is supposed to be a sort of "small claims court" for domain disputes.</p><p></p><p>What it seems to have become is a bounty hunter for corporate clients where a black box process is used to assign 1-3 panelists who deliberate behind closed doors to render callous disregard for private property that is used in good faith.</p><p></p><p>The issue to be pursued is not whether or not registrants will be compensated for 2 specific domains: fortini.com and vocl.com. The real issue is whether or not WIPO and ADR are fit to govern.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, I believe scalable and cost-effective counter-measures will emerge that combine technology and process to protect the interests of registrants. Examples from Epik Holdings Inc:</p><p></p><p>DNProtect.com is a partial solution in allowing domain owners to mitigate against loss through pooled access to resources who work to protect domain assets.</p><p></p><p>DNAdvocate.com is an emerging solution for specifically engaging legal counsel for navigating the intellectual property landscape.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robmonster, post: 2344647, member: 143534"] WIPO and ADR were supposed to make the world work better -- a private dispute resolution protocol instead of using the court system. It is supposed to be a sort of "small claims court" for domain disputes. What it seems to have become is a bounty hunter for corporate clients where a black box process is used to assign 1-3 panelists who deliberate behind closed doors to render callous disregard for private property that is used in good faith. The issue to be pursued is not whether or not registrants will be compensated for 2 specific domains: fortini.com and vocl.com. The real issue is whether or not WIPO and ADR are fit to govern. In the meantime, I believe scalable and cost-effective counter-measures will emerge that combine technology and process to protect the interests of registrants. Examples from Epik Holdings Inc: DNProtect.com is a partial solution in allowing domain owners to mitigate against loss through pooled access to resources who work to protect domain assets. DNAdvocate.com is an emerging solution for specifically engaging legal counsel for navigating the intellectual property landscape. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Rob Monster wants to get Voc(a)l.
Top
Bottom