Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Rob Monster wants to get Voc(a)l.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neoget" data-source="post: 2344714" data-attributes="member: 322978465"><p>I have read today the entire case.</p><p>The VOCL is a broad acronym and can be used for anything, the complainant is not worthy of owning that domain free of charge, he did not invent that domain name, he is primarily targeting the .COM TLD and not the others, his trademark was not VOCL at all and it even does not cover the entire physical or digital world he is not (GOD) but his creation, you own only what you hold at the moment.</p><p></p><p>This is a little bit obsucre, because how can you allow a trademark owner to own a domain if he is not the original creator of that DN in (?) there are prety allot of VOCL in other TLD's, gTLD's and ccTLD's which other Registry are benefiting from the reg/renewals and they do not block such regs.</p><p></p><p>For example vocl\net is at 280$ at SAV and no body cares much to buy it, the complainant main target is only the .COM as many of them do, only to gather this TLD and not the others.</p><p></p><p><em>The Complainant is a Nevada corporation that operates a social media platform under the name “Vocal,” which is located at the URL “vocal.media.” The Complainant owns a <strong>United States</strong> trademark registration for VOCAL (Reg. No. 5,438,308, registered on April 3, 2018), and has used the VOCAL mark publically in connection with its business for slightly less than five years.</em></p><p></p><p>Then go and get your .US domain name and stop grabbing the .COM domnains, the .COM is a global TLD and it does not belong to your country, you should better advertise into your US citizens mind the .us ccTLD so they understand that they can have only that ccTLD and not the global, to own the global TLD you will have to buy it from current owner this is what my panel decided.</p><p></p><p>P.s. I m not sure if I have read but what is the Complainants name (?), I can't recall them to mention his name in that case but only his trademark and website, or I have missed it somewhere cause EN is not my native.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neoget, post: 2344714, member: 322978465"] I have read today the entire case. The VOCL is a broad acronym and can be used for anything, the complainant is not worthy of owning that domain free of charge, he did not invent that domain name, he is primarily targeting the .COM TLD and not the others, his trademark was not VOCL at all and it even does not cover the entire physical or digital world he is not (GOD) but his creation, you own only what you hold at the moment. This is a little bit obsucre, because how can you allow a trademark owner to own a domain if he is not the original creator of that DN in (?) there are prety allot of VOCL in other TLD's, gTLD's and ccTLD's which other Registry are benefiting from the reg/renewals and they do not block such regs. For example vocl\net is at 280$ at SAV and no body cares much to buy it, the complainant main target is only the .COM as many of them do, only to gather this TLD and not the others. [I]The Complainant is a Nevada corporation that operates a social media platform under the name “Vocal,” which is located at the URL “vocal.media.” The Complainant owns a [B]United States[/B] trademark registration for VOCAL (Reg. No. 5,438,308, registered on April 3, 2018), and has used the VOCAL mark publically in connection with its business for slightly less than five years.[/I] Then go and get your .US domain name and stop grabbing the .COM domnains, the .COM is a global TLD and it does not belong to your country, you should better advertise into your US citizens mind the .us ccTLD so they understand that they can have only that ccTLD and not the global, to own the global TLD you will have to buy it from current owner this is what my panel decided. P.s. I m not sure if I have read but what is the Complainants name (?), I can't recall them to mention his name in that case but only his trademark and website, or I have missed it somewhere cause EN is not my native. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Rob Monster wants to get Voc(a)l.
Top
Bottom