For Sale sale of the century

[cyphix]

I offer a black little beetle type thing that is currently crawling on some of my papers.

 

[cyphix]

Actually I think it may have been a small cockroach :goofy:

 

[UKPro]

Have I won Yet?
Is this a 1 year auction?

 

[UKPro]

Do you take Credit cards?
PayPal charge 1.3% more than my merchant

 

[.com.net.org]

please proof your ownership by scanning your payment receipt.

 

[WebCat]

Oh PLEASE DotLeader, will you consider the following offer:

I will trade for a small bridge I own. It's near San Francisco, and is a beautiful reddish-gold color. AFTER you transfer the domain to my account at at LenningradRegister.com.scam, I will transfer the complete title to you!

Do we have a deal???

 

[UKPro]

Shame Webcat - I was considering making you an offer on IslamDomains.com

 

[WebCat]

Sorry UKPro!

Look, I really DO own the bridge! I got it from a friend of mine in Bogota! HE acquired it in a three-way trade for some useless tower somewhere in Paris! What a chump!

Peace,
WebCat:cheeky:

 

[DotLeader]

UKPro your PM box is full :-D

 

[JoDomains]

Wait, I was out of town. Is this auction closed???!!!! If not, then my new bid is $1.50.

 

[DotLeader]

sorry its closed

can i interest you in another of my GENERIC domains though?

bighooha.com
k:

 

[JoDomains]

oh no, nothing is compared to that domain :-D , thank you dotleader

 

[DotLeader]

:-D

i guess your all wondering how i got all these ARE generic domains huh?

 

[TrafficMonsterRRR]

These generic domains are now worth $$$, FYI - but you can joke about it all you want.

Don't be fooled by the humourous context of this thread.

According to a recent report by domain name research think-tank AS-WIPO (Association of Servers of World Intellectual Property Owners), nine out of ten domain names sold or traded daily have a potential WIPO or TM case waiting to happen. An example of this enormous liability all of us domaintraders may be carrying is the recent AS-WIPO case of <fatbitch.com>. The one-member AS-WIPO review panel decided that the name was to be transfered to a complainant from Philadelphia who filed a case claiming "my family has always called me "fat bitch" as have all of my neighbors, and even my children's friends at school and their parents too. There may be other fat bitches out there but I am the only FAT BITCH period-end".

The respondent's defense (that "fat bitch" is a generic term and could not be claimed ownership of) was overuled given overwhelming evidence presented by the complainant supporting "bad faith" from the part of the respondent: "the <respondent> has failed to establish, portray, imply or depict on the website in question <fatbitch.com> a fat bitch as bad and mean as <the complainant> and thus is in bad faith of the extent of badness and actual magnitude of fatness and bitchdom".

In the decision statement awarding ownership to the complainant, the panelist stated: "In all fairness, "fat bitches" may be an apparently generic term used to denote irritable large sized women, but "fat bitch" is clearly an expletive owned by the complainant". The panelist also stated "the actual physiological weight of the complainant is irrelevant as no state or federal regulatory statutes currently exist regarding physical weight requirements in owning intellectual right to a domain name".

Blatantly rubbing it in, the victorious complainant said in an interview to the DomainNameJourney (DNJourney.com): "it was a typical Saturday night. I was watching the late HBO2 movie and my youngest son was surfing the net for porn. When I heard him scream MOMMA, SUM F**KER HAS STOLE YER HANDEL, I knew I had to act... where is this world coming to!?"

Detailed investigation into the case file revealed that early in the review process, the respondent presented as counter evidence an alleged email form the complainant's son containing original correspondence stating: WE 'R GONNA WIP YER AS*". The alleged email which was sent from the compainant's AOL account could not be verified as authentic during the review process because the complainant's son stated "I give out mom's AOL password in sex chatrooms all the time for favors". He added "we originally were going to call mom fatAs*hole. We might 've had to go up against Orson Wells or Marlon Brando."

------------------------------
Another domain reseller bites the dust, as far as I can see. Now do you guys see why domains like the one on auction here are so widely sought after? . HUrry 'cause we are running out of generic character combinations.

Cheers.

 

[WebCat]

Hey TrafficMonster! Thanks for the amazing information!

If what you say above is TRUE, I am IMMEDIATELY heading to the WIPO site and staking a claim to the following domain names:

1) Asshole.com
2) BigDick.com
3) SmartAssMoFo.com
4) OhBabyYourTheBest.com

My Ex can also claim:

1) SchemingBitch.com
2) 10DumbestWomenonEarth.com
and of course.....
3) OhGodWhyDidHeDumpMe.net

I'll keep you posted on the results! :laugh:

WebCat

 

[TrafficMonsterRRR]

Originally posted by WebCat
Hey TrafficMonster! Thanks for the amazing information!

If what you say above is TRUE, I am IMMEDIATELY heading to the WIPO site and staking a claim to the following domain names:

Don't ..err quote me on this, but I believe it is AS-WIPO where it all happens, not WIPO (no endorsement of either implied - information submitted for entertainment purposes only, blah blah blah.. )

 

[UKPro]

Sorry Dot L - Did I win?!!

Please e-mail me your paypal details and I will ensure that funds are sent without delay
[email protected]

Wow - I won I won I won! Yeaaaaaaaaaaah!

 

[UKPro]

lwgik - this domain is now available at US$75,000 -

Escrow transactions only

 

[Ed30]

Originally posted by TrafficMonsterRRR
These generic domains are now worth $$$, FYI - but you can joke about it all you want.

Don't be fooled by the humourous context of this thread.

According to a recent report by domain name research think-tank AS-WIPO (Association of Servers of World Intellectual Property Owners), nine out of ten domain names sold or traded daily have a potential WIPO or TM case waiting to happen. An example of this enormous liability all of us domaintraders may be carrying is the recent AS-WIPO case of <fatbitch.com>. The one-member AS-WIPO review panel decided that the name was to be transfered to a complainant from Philadelphia who filed a case claiming "my family has always called me "fat bitch" as have all of my neighbors, and even my children's friends at school and their parents too. There may be other fat bitches out there but I am the only FAT BITCH period-end".

The respondent's defense (that "fat bitch" is a generic term and could not be claimed ownership of) was overuled given overwhelming evidence presented by the complainant supporting "bad faith" from the part of the respondent: "the <respondent> has failed to establish, portray, imply or depict on the website in question <fatbitch.com> a fat bitch as bad and mean as <the complainant> and thus is in bad faith of the extent of badness and actual magnitude of fatness and bitchdom".

In the decision statement awarding ownership to the complainant, the panelist stated: "In all fairness, "fat bitches" may be an apparently generic term used to denote irritable large sized women, but "fat bitch" is clearly an expletive owned by the complainant". The panelist also stated "the actual physiological weight of the complainant is irrelevant as no state or federal regulatory statutes currently exist regarding physical weight requirements in owning intellectual right to a domain name".

Blatantly rubbing it in, the victorious complainant said in an interview to the DomainNameJourney (DNJourney.com): "it was a typical Saturday night. I was watching the late HBO2 movie and my youngest son was surfing the net for porn. When I heard him scream MOMMA, SUM F**KER HAS STOLE YER HANDEL, I knew I had to act... where is this world coming to!?"

Detailed investigation into the case file revealed that early in the review process, the respondent presented as counter evidence an alleged email form the complainant's son containing original correspondence stating: WE 'R GONNA WIP YER AS*". The alleged email which was sent from the compainant's AOL account could not be verified as authentic during the review process because the complainant's son stated "I give out mom's AOL password in sex chatrooms all the time for favors". He added "we originally were going to call mom fatAs*hole. We might 've had to go up against Orson Wells or Marlon Brando."

------------------------------
Another domain reseller bites the dust, as far as I can see. Now do you guys see why domains like the one on auction here are so widely sought after? . HUrry 'cause we are running out of generic character combinations.

Cheers.

I own dimwit.net (my knickname since birth :goofy: ), does this mean I have a case for getting dimwit.com and becoming a premiere dimwit? :laugh:

 

[UKPro]

Lol - Class ED!