- Joined
- Jan 20, 2005
- Messages
- 626
- Reaction score
- 0
full story:
http://www.out-law.com/page-6551
What an interesting ruling, of course the fact that the respondent registered the domain a year before Skype.com was registered is essential but it is suprising to see panellists argue that Skype allowing him to to be an affiliate with this domain could mean that they have acknowlegded his rights to the domain.
http://www.out-law.com/page-6551
What an interesting ruling, of course the fact that the respondent registered the domain a year before Skype.com was registered is essential but it is suprising to see panellists argue that Skype allowing him to to be an affiliate with this domain could mean that they have acknowlegded his rights to the domain.
