-
Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Offers Sneak2 Network for sale, HUGE Network
- Thread starter stoned
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2004
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeh. Fabulous buy. If only I had more capital :-( Best of luck to you with it 
D
dragonhawk
Guest
stoned, I have sent you a PM and it has been confirmed as read, but you did not reply?
The Sneak2 network that you sold me is barely receiving 700 visitors a day and I've had my stats program running for over a week since I purchased the site. You claimed in your initial post that the Sneak2 network was receiving 8500 visitors a day but clearly they are not.
I would appreciate it if you would reply to my PM asap so we can settle this little problem that has arisen without involving any 3rd parties.
The Sneak2 network that you sold me is barely receiving 700 visitors a day and I've had my stats program running for over a week since I purchased the site. You claimed in your initial post that the Sneak2 network was receiving 8500 visitors a day but clearly they are not.
I would appreciate it if you would reply to my PM asap so we can settle this little problem that has arisen without involving any 3rd parties.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2004
- Messages
- 627
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah i agree with dragonhawk, sneak2 is reciving 700 unique visitors per day , although 200 visitors he is getting himself so just 500.
Prolly fake stats those were.
Prolly fake stats those were.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2002
- Messages
- 1,810
- Reaction score
- 3
dragonhawk contact him on aim he's always on
cutelittlematt89 is his screenname
cutelittlematt89 is his screenname
arty:
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 665
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey, You have changed the source code of the website, And You have changed the stats program. The website was sold as is. The website never had any fake traffic while I operated it.
PS: Please dont post that away message, I am aware of it now. I seemed to have gotten a AIM Virus?
PS: Please dont post that away message, I am aware of it now. I seemed to have gotten a AIM Virus?
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2004
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Jonathan said:
you're not required to put your messenger addresses in your public profile ... but getting back to the original post that started this, I believe Jeff was trying to be helpful ...
Vivvy
D
dragonhawk
Guest
stoned said:
Hmm, so you're saying that if I didn't improve the script and the design of the page, and if I didn't change the stats program to something else, I would get that kind of traffic? And if I hadn't been feeding the site with some of my own traffic, I would get around 8500 visitors a day?
I'm sure you would agree that even if we used a different stats program, that the number of visitors recorded should not differ by 8000? If it differed by 1000 or 2000, then I'd let things go, but 8000?
Anyway, I have sent you a PM and I'm waiting on AIM and MSN for you so we can discuss the problem privately and hopefully come to a resolution.
Btw, I'm not sure if this is true or if it's the AIM virus you got, but it now says you're on jury duty in your AIM away message.
D
dragonhawk
Guest
stoned said:
I'm online and waiting for you now... been waiting the last few hours. I've already added you to my MSN and also to AIM.
RADiSTAR, thank you for your support.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2002
- Messages
- 1,810
- Reaction score
- 3
Looks like he doesn't want to be contacted as he took his aim name out of his user profile
D
dragonhawk
Guest
Yes, it sure looks that way.
This is what has been sent to me through PM so far:
I also took the liberty of analyzing your stats program. It looks like it was custom coded? Anyway, according to the logs that your script is analyzing, it counted 4 hits as 4 visitors. Each hit was from the same IP, and within the space of 10 seconds. There was also quite a number of occassions where there were around 6 hits, all from the same IP, with exactly same details within the space of 2 seconds. That was counted as 6 different visitors by your stats program.
I have proof for all this as I have the logs that you used to generate your traffic report and I also have the code for your traffic program. I am sure that if someone else analyzed the code also, they would see the same flaws I see in that program.
This would mean that your initial post with the traffic details have been inflated by quite a bit.
Let's assume that you did not write the stats program and you assumed that all the stats it recorded is correct. This means, that your post is accurate as you did not know that your stats program was incorrect. In this case, you should act professionally now that you know your stats program does not function correctly, and either:
1) Fully refund the purchase thus retaining your integrity and reputation. In this case, I will return all the domains back to you with some improvements that I've made to the sneak2 engine at no extra charge.
2) Discuss with me any alternative arrangements if you would prefer not to refund the full amount of the purchase.
At the moment, your actions show that you are trying to avoid the issue. It shows that you are attempting to hide, which in all senses means that you knew that you were committing fraud from the start.
However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt at this time. Therefore, I urge you to contact me as soon as possible rather than avoid me so we can finally put this problem (or potential misunderstanding) to rest.
This is what has been sent to me through PM so far:
Well Matt, for one, this would mean that you're counting page views and not visitors. The stats program that I use counts the page views also and I get approximately 2000 page views a day, which is still short of your 8500 visitors that you claimed you receive on a daily basis.
I also took the liberty of analyzing your stats program. It looks like it was custom coded? Anyway, according to the logs that your script is analyzing, it counted 4 hits as 4 visitors. Each hit was from the same IP, and within the space of 10 seconds. There was also quite a number of occassions where there were around 6 hits, all from the same IP, with exactly same details within the space of 2 seconds. That was counted as 6 different visitors by your stats program.
I have proof for all this as I have the logs that you used to generate your traffic report and I also have the code for your traffic program. I am sure that if someone else analyzed the code also, they would see the same flaws I see in that program.
This would mean that your initial post with the traffic details have been inflated by quite a bit.
Let's assume that you did not write the stats program and you assumed that all the stats it recorded is correct. This means, that your post is accurate as you did not know that your stats program was incorrect. In this case, you should act professionally now that you know your stats program does not function correctly, and either:
1) Fully refund the purchase thus retaining your integrity and reputation. In this case, I will return all the domains back to you with some improvements that I've made to the sneak2 engine at no extra charge.
2) Discuss with me any alternative arrangements if you would prefer not to refund the full amount of the purchase.
At the moment, your actions show that you are trying to avoid the issue. It shows that you are attempting to hide, which in all senses means that you knew that you were committing fraud from the start.
However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt at this time. Therefore, I urge you to contact me as soon as possible rather than avoid me so we can finally put this problem (or potential misunderstanding) to rest.
- Status
