D
Deleted member 4749
Guest
When more than one person owns something, it's harder to take it away.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,228
- Reaction score
- 0
can you elaborate? it would not seem to matter. perhaps the fusu "shareholders" are more equipped to fight back, but that won't help prevent a domain from being swiped away.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 2,642
- Reaction score
- 1
i really like fusu concept- thought i don't think it can be anyhow related to snowbill prevention
also i doubt there will be really serious investor interest in to investing in domains over use of which they have no control at all, i mean if they accepting investor funds, they should at least not park domains like they did with rvx.com (serving trademarked ads) and do as much as they can to avoid being udpered
dono
also i doubt there will be really serious investor interest in to investing in domains over use of which they have no control at all, i mean if they accepting investor funds, they should at least not park domains like they did with rvx.com (serving trademarked ads) and do as much as they can to avoid being udpered
dono
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,853
- Reaction score
- 13
filled out the forms for 20 domains at fusu, heard nothing at all from them.
- Status
Similar threads
